A student’s development and their ability to thrive in their education is the only positive signal of a well defined K-12 curriculum development which is at least a year long activity. This can only be achieved by paying enough attention to each individual strength of the student and focus on their areas of improvement to ensure progress throughout the year and ensure continued learning through their years in school.

To ensure the effectiveness of K-12 curriculum development it is necessary to focus on the development cycle of the curriculum which should be a multiyear approach. This cycle should be organised into a master schedule that allows for evaluations, revisions, research and refinements to the next step of K-12 curriculum development.

Each of these schedules need to be reviewed on a monthly basis to allow for a balance between the understanding of the student and the introduction of new materials in the form of any K-12 elearning solutions. The first two schedules should focus on new writing and revisions while the further cycles should focus on documentation, evaluation and suitable refinement to the K-12 curriculum development.

These schedules should be made depending upon the readiness of individual schools and the stage of their students’ cognitive, emotional and social development in direct consultations with administrators, teachers and curriculum educationists. The final teaching method to be employed is only the first step in the learning environment which is best identified by the teacher themselves evaluating depending upon their individual strengths and weaknesses.

Any of these teaching methods may or may not employ suitable K-12 elearning solutions to teach but neither of them are better than the other depending upon your particular class and situation. These teaching methods are:

1. Teacher centered approach: This method views the teacher as the active party where the teacher passes the information along to the student who receive it passively. Students at the end of the lesson are tested in various ways and graded accordingly. The teacher is the only expert in this method and an authority in the classroom.

2. Student centered approach: Both the teacher and the student are equally responsible for teaching and learning. The teacher is a facilitator who provides a basic understanding of the material. The students in this case are evaluated in formal assessments as well as informal ones in terms of group projects, participation levels, portfolios, class presentations, etc.

Once you have finalised your teaching method, you need to next focus on which grade or class you would teach. Children from kindergarten to grade 3 are arguably the toughest to teach as this is the most critical time during any child’s development and education. The way they are taught during this time will set the stage for them towards their understanding the world later.

The three things most important at this stage of their life is to engage them in the learning and help develop their problem solving while boosting their creativity while making them take initiative towards learning. One needs to follow a few steps to easily achieve this tall order:

• Define responsibilities, behaviours and classroom routines.
• Develop relationships between and with students for better engagement.
• Provide tools in the form of K-12 elearning solutions to help them pay attention.
• Practise focus and resist distractions.
• Create scenarios where students decide and promote participation.
• Set up them on short lessons to help them focus.
• Plan long term and short term activities in the form of games.
• Follow multi step plans for completing tasks.
• Bring concepts from diverse areas of study together and discuss.
• Help them to participate and take leadership opportunities in group settings.
• Apply strategies to help them solve social problems with adult assistance.

Regardless of the teaching method any educationist employs, the most important part is to read your classroom and then tailor your teaching method accordingly. No one teaching method is better than the other, which is also true for any of the K-12 elearning solutions. On an individual basis, some students respond better to one while not being at all affected by the other. A teacher’s work never stops.